Untitled Page

I have found in several Supreme Court of the United States decisions several times a comment that if Congress had went to the trouble to codify it, then is was somehow special. I had the clues from the revised statutes of 1874 and 1878 that Congress had attempted to totally start anew with the Revised Statutes [got to go back and get the documents on that now for conclusive evidence], but had to back down some as the decisions of the Supreme Court prior to the Revision were not to be used as I recall the Supreme Court wasn't happy and then the Congress in 1878 let the Revised Statutes become only prima facia evidence of the law.

When you attempt to overthrow a government, the process of codification is used. You can combine the country's law and the Roman Law and gradually dump the true law and totally void the Constitution(s).In the attached scanned documents, you will find the following:

"The formal effect of codification is to set aside the existing law in its entirety, as far at the territory affected is concerned, and to substitute for all the law transmitted from the past a single new code.

So when one of the new corporate States comes into existence, instead one of the "several States", they adopt the "CODE". I always wondered why they didn't enact into law instead of just adopting CODE. Now it makes perfect good sense. You can bring the territorial law forward and Congress is still in charge in one sense as you aren't one of the several States and also by and through the 14th amendment with no Bill of Rights, Congress as a National Legislature enacts laws that bind [Roman Private Law] the people as individuals (commerce) See Cook v. Gralike,531 U.S. 510, 528. This is all PRIVATE LAW - OBLIGATIONS, CONTRACTS, ETC. You can't enact into law in one of the new several States, as they don't exist. Also you are wanting to continue the process of dumping the English common-law, and replacing it with the Roman Civil Law. therefore in the CODE you can omit, delete, amend to read at will, etc by and through a Revisor of Statutes, being one of the BAR ATTORNEYS of one of the BAR ASSOCIATIONS. PRETTY DARN SLICK!!!. The BAR WAS AND STILL IS IN CHARGE WHEN IT IS ALL SAID AND DONE. THEY WRITE IT FOR THE CONGRESS/LEGISLATURE AND THEN WHEN THE TIME IS RIGHT, THEY DUMP CODE AS OBSOLETE, OMITTED, ETC.

This is why all of the courts are statutory non constitutional courts. Roman Civil Law didn't have in reality any Constitution as we know it with the people being the sovereigns. A full delegation of authority of a representative Republic resided Roman Senate, until a Caesar chose to change it. In a constitutional Republic only a LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER is given to one of the several States and a GRANT to the United States, with the sovereign power residing in the people as citizens of the United States of America.

Let the Lincoln fans in ignorance proceed forward, but does this now not give a different meaning to the Lieber Codes of Lincoln. Yep, it was the most heinous despot and tyrant of the constitutional Republic.

Unbelievable, but at least it now makes perfect sense to the game that is being played in the STATES and the UNITED STATES of America.

June 17, 2003

As I stated in an earlier post the idea of replacing the existing law forum and/or combining the two law forums with the [Roman] civil law is accomplished by and through the process of codification. Then the original law form is diluted and then can be dumped gradually.

I went to the UAA library on June 17, 2003 and found part of what I had remembered being there. I left the Senate Congressional copy on the copier - Darn. I thought it was the court cases that the Supreme court could not look back into as I remembered, but it was to correct any errors of the Revised Statutes, being that the court couldn't look back to the original statutes. This reinforces the idea that Congress was going to use the RS to change the law and law forums - i.e codification.

If you follow the Judges Oaths, ect up and through the year of 1909 [I think this is the year of another codification - will check later], at the very end of the ACT, they then repeal the link to the RS 1878 that links to the original law and Constitution. And of course we have the 1940's code and the 1948 and the 1966. Check out the links of the Oath of USC 28 § 453 - the links are broken.

So Congress didn't get the total replacement break of the "law" in 1878 on say the judges, but about 30 years later the job was completed.

Lest we not forget that once in the codification process, now a revisor of statutes [bar member(s)] drops out parts of the code with the extreme clarity of "omitted", "deleted", "obsolete", etc. Did you ever NOTICE that they don't go back and repeal the original statute usually? Why? Isn't just the CODE supposedly just prima facia? Wouldn't you have to repeal the original statue if you are to go back to the original to validate the words? My, the ways we convolute a simple process of enacting public statutes and repealing them.

I will in the next several days get the complete links together on the judges as they do not exist arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States [didn't in Roman law either] - only the code of acts of recent years. If they do not attach to the Constitution, they are not judicial Officers of the United States. Now that is IMPORTANT. They are just the mere "employees" of an external establishment [ more on that in a later post].

Next the item that I found in the Roman law is the dual system of law. "In every department of the law, but more particularly in private law and in civil procedure, an antithesis arose between law in the strict and proper sense (jus civile) and the law made by officials (jus honorarium)"

***

"Praetorian law, in the shape it assumed in the edict, was not strictly speaking, law, but the power involved in the right to allow or disallow actions and other legal remedies virtually raised it to the position of law. Thus we find Cicero declaring that even at his time the edict was felt to be a kind of law. The practorian law, being a law made by officials ('jus honorarium'), was opposed to the jus civile, or law of the strict and proper sense of the term, the law made by the people."

Now if you read the Alaska Rules of Court where the praetors [judges of today] trump the jus civile [legislature] by edict [Supreme Court Orders in Alaska] and also by rule of court do the Child in Need, etc, this mirrors the [Roman] civil law. This was referred to in the book as "judge made law". See Blacks law dictionary - its there. More on this later.

Now we can either continue to play in the BS brown stuff or attempt to restore a Constitutional Republic.

I have some ideas on this now that I think can have some real effect. Major problems for them today.

1. Assistance of Counsel- constitutional- none exist today.

2. Juries - citizenship - easier in state courts - national citizens=US citizens - not people of the Land for Law of the Land. Changed from freeholders of the Land to "registered voters" - corporate. No qualified jurors today.

3. Criminal charges are not laws of the United States or laws of Alaska - called codifications.

4. "Constitution of Alaska" is non existent, being the Law of the country of Alaska - i.e. Law of the Land. Only the "Constitution of the State of Alaska"- wrong - this is of the corporation. Just found this major change as Dave Bartels was noting this in the 1819 Virginal Code. By the way the Virginia Code was just to put all of the total acts together in a sequence in a two books and also missing is the "terms" [words of art], just plain English- what a novel idea.

SB541 Congressional Records Cover PDF

SB541 Congressional Records Senate pg. 1376 PDF

June 20, 2003

This is the other document from the Congressional records
that goes with the house record for SB 541 for evidence, being the
senate journal. I have also included the the original act that
attempted to get the "conclusive evidence" being the Revised Statutes
to be the beginning of the law, eliminating looking back at the
original acts of congress by the courts. This is the process of
codification as posted earlier. Your Roman civil law.
This is conclusive evidence of what the congress was up to in
the 1870's They still got the judicial links killed in 1911 by
codification. I don't have time to list the revised statues as to
what they are, but I have included a pdf of the part where they
eliminated the link to the revised statutes of 1878, which then
eliminated the court from looking back to the original statutes prior
to 1878. Congress waited for about 30 plus years, but they still got
it accomplished. Witness the elimination of the judicial Branch
arising under the Constitution of the United States and the laws of
the United States.
They also changed the civil commissions for the judges from
the secretary of state to the DOJ in about 1895. Pretty darn slick.

See also praetor (judges today), praetorian law, and lex
praetorian(rules of court today).

19 Stat 268 PDF

SB541 pg. 1137 PDF

36 Stat 1087 Act to Revise PDF

36 Stat 1087 Genreal Provisions PDF


THE INSTITUTES A TEXTBOOK OF THE HISTORY AND SYSTEM OF ROMAN PRIVATE LAW
	Cover Page pdf	pgs. 4 - 6 pdf