USE OF FORCE CONTINUUM
This Use of Force Continuum is from the Alaska State Troopers
The court case is just one of many
to demonstrate what I proffer is true.

        What people are not understanding is that the police, firemen, FBI, ect are all members of a paramilitary organization(s)  They have been militarized and not not civil officers to which they appear to want us to believe they are.  Ask them?  I have the commissioning documents on the AST, but this is not included as yahoo will not pass all of the info in one post.  If wanted, e-mail and I will forward.

        They use the Use of Force Continuum against us.  All Police Force types will have a policy and procedures manual, which will have a Use of Force Continuum contained within.  You may have to lean on them to produce the Use of Force Continuum parts, as they don't want the public to know who they are and what they are doing.

FROM Alaska State Troopers Use of Force Continuum parts:
 
1.      First read the 107.101 intent of the disclaimer as evidence.
2.      107.020 (A)(1) the purpose of the use of the force is to gain control of a person, ect.
3.      107.020 (B), when practical, a verbal warning should be used before force is being used.
4.      107.020 (C)(1) Can't use force as punishment or retaliation.
5.      107.020 (C)(2) Accomplish the officers "lawful" objectives, etc including physical control.
6.      107.020 (C)(3) can use any level of force
7.      107.020 (C)(4) The Use of Force Continuum
        a.      Officer presence, uniform
        b.      Verbal Commands [military orders in reality]
        c.      Soft hand techniques - grabbing you and a heel hand hit.
        d.      OC - pepper spray [you will got to jail if they use this]
        e.      Batons
        f.      TAZARS
        g.      Deadly force
8.      107.030 A use of Force Form just be filled out.  Ask for it!



        So what is happening when a police officer walks up to your car window with his traffic lights flashing or walks up to you in the street.

        First he is ALWAYS USING  FORCE against you to gain control of YOU and to conduct an custodial interrogation[investigation] and he is instilling FEAR!
        Should you not be in FEAR of your LIFE knowing of the Use of Force Continuum that the OFFICER is using, is trained to use, and will not stop until [continuum]  YOU SUBMIT while he is carrying weapons of deadly force, OC, and TZAR's to use at his discretion as long as he justifies said use to HIS leaders and the DA?

        You can use the am I under arrest, am I free to go and are you conducting a custodial interrogation to invoke your Constitutional secured rights.
        After that is accomplished, I would clearly use the words similar to "I am in fear of my life, as I know you have been trained in the use of deadly force and you are now using the Use of Force Continuum and to what ends, I do not know. I see [or suspect] that you have a loaded weapon, OC [pepper spray], a TAZAR and who knows what else upon your person at this time.  Is that correct Sir?

        Because I am in in Fear of my Life, I, John Doe, under the laws of necessity am giving you some identification.  Otherwise, stand upon you constitutional rights, unless your safety or whatever becomes an issue.  Being dead or injured, does not justify being right.  Live to fight another day.

        This should then disable all evidence that could be used against you in any future Complaint or whatever.

        But also, if you have demanded Assistance of Counsel, the cop should then be liable to a law suit if he continues, which most of them will.  He violated your constitutionally secured right and did not have jurisdiction to proceed.  This last part of jurisdiction to proceed, I will be researching out in the near future to validate if true, i.e. exceeded his authority.

        To further validate that the Police are Military, we find in the Alaska Statutes the following:

AS 18.65.110  Members not to interfere with rights and property.

  Members of the state troopers may not interfere with the rights or property of any person except in a lawful manner necessary for the prevention of crime or the capture and arrest of an offender.

        The troopers can not even arrest.  They must capture and arrest!  Capture means taking by military power, then arrest (civil side).  See United States v. Athens Armory, 24 F.Cas. 878, 880 (1868)
Alaska Department of Public Safety Operating Procedures Manual Use of Force
This is a case from New York explaining the use of force by police.